editors
a group of incompetent assholes who
review the submissions of definitions here on urban dictionary. is it really necesary to have over
350 definitions for the word penis? the majority of the definitions on this site either repeat exactly what another definition says or they don't even add a single intelligent thought to the word
being defined and is irrelevant. the fact that that i've written legitimate definitions to words that have not been defined yet further proves the editors' stupidity.
editors
by skychasma on Sep 14, 2016 07:57:25
Something you can become with one
click of
a mouse.
Maybe having the ability for ANYONE to become an
editor wasn't a very good idea, huh?
Example:
There are very few editors who actually do their job right and
deny and
accept the right
definitions.
editors
by Angry somoan on Aug 22, 2006 07:20:21
editors
by Yea Fuck You Too on Jan 11, 2008 09:01:32
A bunch of fuck heads that decide whether or not words are published on UD. They take several weeks to "review" a word, and most likely just "chose to not
publish your word" without telling you why. Just like they "chose to not publish" this word.
urban dictionary: "
Define your world"...
lol ok.
This word will not get published, Yea I know.
editors
by Calico Kitsune on Nov 27, 2006 09:34:55
1) The
hard-working folks entrusted with reviewing all submissions to Urban Dictionary. They're not perfect, but bless their hearts, they do a darn good job at the end of the day. We should all thank the editors by buying them beer and sex.
2) The
dickholes who thought they were too good to
publish your definition. Hopefully their skin will fall off.
editors
by lambogod on Aug 07, 2009 15:42:23
editors
by Freakin' Sweet! on Oct 16, 2006 02:53:54
Some of them are
noobs that just
reject every
submission that comes their way. Others are actually intelligient and choose the right definitions to go in and reject the absolutely stupid definitions.
editors
by sammykinzandabster on Jun 27, 2009 10:09:10
editors
by annoyed with on Nov 03, 2007 12:23:25
On
urbandictionary.com, the people who are responsible for approving or denying definition submissions but take WAY too long (at least weeks) for one or both of two reasons: they're lazy and don't really care, or there aren't enough of them
to handle all of the submissions, of which
I'm sure there is an overwhelming amount.
Example:
I think it's been almost a whole month since I submitted a few definitions, and it still says "Your submission is
under review by editors" for all of them. I doubt they were denied because they didn't include anything that could possibly offend anyone, advertising, names, even personal opinions, or anything against
urbandictionary.com's guidelines.
editors
by Pokedex #184 on Aug 20, 2017 08:23:45
The people that approve of the definitions you post before it appears on Urban Dictionary. 75% of them are assholes that
reject everything. They are responsible for most of
your definitions that don't make it and
rot.
Example:
Guy: Dog; an
canine animal that
barks
*5-90 Minutes later*
*Gets E-mail saying "Dog
was not published"*
Guy: Those motherfucking editors are bitches sometimes.