Oooooh are they wrong to ignore your
appeal? Is that what it is? Like, if someone is refusing to let you on their platform after they used the things you said to
generate revenue, are they wrong to ignore you?
Example:
Hym "Nobody here is ever done that before, right? I mean the thing Twitter did to
Jordan Peterson. Nobody here has ever generated revenue off of the written words and thoughts of someone else and then ignored that person while refusing to acknowledge that person's appeal on their platform, have they? Anybody? Is that wrong? Are they wrong to do it?"
Dr.
Jeepjorp"No! It'S fInE wHeN i Do It BuT wHeN tHeY dO iT tO mE, iT's BaD! I'm DoInG iT tO tHe RiGhT pEoPlE!"
Hym "Yeah, ok, how's
Chris Pine's acting shit head? Is it brilliant? Bet you're stoked that all your friends and family are helping you
monetize that in the form of content, huh? No. Twitter didn't do EXACTLY the same thing you're doing to me. And here you are with everyone else complaining about it. Just like me. Isn't that crazy? Isn't that strange? It isn't to me because that's how I said things work in the world (which just makes me CORRECT again)."