'Why do you care?' politics
Liberal political strategy as it relates to social issues. I'm going to break this down to demonstrate that liberals are not smart in any way shape or form and that I AM smart and better than everyone.
Hym "So, 'Why do you care?' politics comes in response to conservative protestations to non-traditional behavior of lifestyles. And it looks like this:"
Trans-gender *exists*
Conservative "Booooo... My incest cult says a magic man forgives all of the bad things I knowingly do and I am immortal... So the tranny can't do that."
Liberal "Why do you care?"
Hym "So, 'Why do you care?' politics comes in response to conservative protestations to non-traditional behavior of lifestyles. And it looks like this:"
Trans-gender *exists*
Conservative "Booooo... My incest cult says a magic man forgives all of the bad things I knowingly do and I am immortal... So the tranny can't do that."
Liberal "Why do you care?"
Example:
Hym "And it's a stupid question. But I'll explain it to you anyway. As Matt Walsh recently said, they think that the absence of problems (-P) = doing an incest cult. So, they care because when you have problems you are going to try to reach your grubby little hands into their solipsistic sphere of subjectivity for a solution to those problems and that might require them to do something other than an incest cult. They're locked in. Or WORSE... Someone who isn't doing an incest cult would be absent of problems. -P would = both doing a incest cult and not doing an incest cult. That would violate the law of non-contradiction. BUT! What they fail to understand... Is that giving the incest cult credit for things it didn't do... Is part of the incest cult. So, back to the trans example... When it comes to hiring, treatment, and rights... They want doing a transgenderism to = (P) problems. And they are actively working to make it so. And that is the case for ALL NON-INCEST CULT VARIABLES. So we'll say they want X (Not doing an incest cult) to = P and they want Y (Doing and incest cult) to = -P and they are doing that deliberately. So, in summary, they care because it invalidates the assertion that X = -P and if X /= -P then they might have to grapple withe the fact that X = P for everyone who isn't doing X. 'Why do you care?' Politics won't ever work because they will always shift into apologetics. Which is just meaningless bloviating that doesn't address the actual issue at hand."
Hym "And it's a stupid question. But I'll explain it to you anyway. As Matt Walsh recently said, they think that the absence of problems (-P) = doing an incest cult. So, they care because when you have problems you are going to try to reach your grubby little hands into their solipsistic sphere of subjectivity for a solution to those problems and that might require them to do something other than an incest cult. They're locked in. Or WORSE... Someone who isn't doing an incest cult would be absent of problems. -P would = both doing a incest cult and not doing an incest cult. That would violate the law of non-contradiction. BUT! What they fail to understand... Is that giving the incest cult credit for things it didn't do... Is part of the incest cult. So, back to the trans example... When it comes to hiring, treatment, and rights... They want doing a transgenderism to = (P) problems. And they are actively working to make it so. And that is the case for ALL NON-INCEST CULT VARIABLES. So we'll say they want X (Not doing an incest cult) to = P and they want Y (Doing and incest cult) to = -P and they are doing that deliberately. So, in summary, they care because it invalidates the assertion that X = -P and if X /= -P then they might have to grapple withe the fact that X = P for everyone who isn't doing X. 'Why do you care?' Politics won't ever work because they will always shift into apologetics. Which is just meaningless bloviating that doesn't address the actual issue at hand."