The Charts Theorem
The scientifically proven process of justifying any sound made in the world is truly "charts" masquerading as another sound. In other words every sound is actually the word "charts".
theorem
1. That which is considered and established as a principle; hence, sometimes, a rule. not theories, but theorems, the intelligible products of contemplation, intellectual objects in the mind, and of and for the mind exclusively.2. (math.) a statement of a principle to be demonstrated.note: a theorem is something to be proved, and is thus distinguished from a problem, which is something to be solved. In analysis, the term is sometimes applied to a rule, especially a rule or statement of relations expressed in a formula or by symbolsLXL Theorem
The LXL Theorem is an advanced philosophical theorem used to differentiate texts from non texts. The LXL Theorem dictates that if one could disprove something's existence, then the non-text nature of the said item would be justified as something that does not exist could not possibly be a text. The theorem has received numerous critical acclaim due to its consistency, logical soundness and overall accuracy. Many other theorems have been derived from the LXL theorem, such as the Reverse LXL Theorem and the Inverse LXL Theorem.
Chens Theorem
"B" being the number of bowls smoked, "P" being the amount of people partaking in aforementioned smoke. Note that all bowls must satisfy MMBP(1) standards.
if "P" is greater than 4:
B is greater than or equal to 1/2(P)
if "P" is less than 4:
B is greater or equal to P
(1) MMBP: Max's Massive Bowl Protocol
if "P" is greater than 4:
B is greater than or equal to 1/2(P)
if "P" is less than 4:
B is greater or equal to P
(1) MMBP: Max's Massive Bowl Protocol
Example:
Person 1: "Man im tired, we've smoked too much..."
Person 2, 3, 4 (simultaneously): " We have to keep smoking, we have not satisfied Chens theorem yet!
Person 1: "Man im tired, we've smoked too much..."
Person 2, 3, 4 (simultaneously): " We have to keep smoking, we have not satisfied Chens theorem yet!
Yeet Theorem
when there is a mathematical problem and there is nearly no solution to solve the problem, yeet theorem may be useful as it ignores every mathematical rules and move the symbols in the equation easily. it may be used as a reference
Major Theorem
Mangolious Theorem
The most complex equation ever devised - so powerful that it can solve any problem, providing that the correct formulee is provided. In short, the mangolious theorem is capable of solving absolutely anything - and is the answer to all questions.
Example:
The mangolious theorem is so long and complicated, that only its creater can even begin to use it.
The mangolious theorem is so long and complicated, that only its creater can even begin to use it.
The Saneil Theorem
For any projectile β in use in a typical gym match, involving any game with a projectile (volleyball, kickball, etc), the closer in proximity that the ball lands to Saniel, regardless of team or positive/negative effect, the more likely the situation is to go wrong and hurt the team.
See Corollary to the Saniel Theorem
See Corollary to the Saniel Theorem
Pythagorean Theorem
The only geometric theorem that will be used in the real world, primarily by tall people figuring out the best way to sleep in short people beds and TV manufacturers trying to find the largest possible number to put on the box.
Example:
Student 1: The pythagorean theorem is actually useful!
Student 2: Really? What's the pissgoreporn theorem?
Student 1: I don't fucking know!
Student 1: The pythagorean theorem is actually useful!
Student 2: Really? What's the pissgoreporn theorem?
Student 1: I don't fucking know!
Goodliffe's Theorem
Goodliffe's Theorem predicts an inverse correlation between an individual's understanding of percentages, and the likelihood that they use the % button on a calculator.
Anyone with a thorough understanding of percentages is highly unlikely to use the % button on a calculator compared to someone with only a limited understanding of percentages.
Anyone with a thorough understanding of percentages is highly unlikely to use the % button on a calculator compared to someone with only a limited understanding of percentages.
Example:
Megan: Hey Phil, I'm trying to work out a percentage thingy, do you reckon Noel would show me how to use the % button on my calculator?
Phil: Are you cray cray?! Noel falls towards the extreme right of the Goodliffe's Theorem Curve - he'd just laugh at your stupidity. Try asking Matt.
Megan: Hey Phil, I'm trying to work out a percentage thingy, do you reckon Noel would show me how to use the % button on my calculator?
Phil: Are you cray cray?! Noel falls towards the extreme right of the Goodliffe's Theorem Curve - he'd just laugh at your stupidity. Try asking Matt.