Example:
2. Tell me why ? I don't like Mondays. Tell me why ? I don't like Mondayyys

Example:
Everyone I don't like is literally Hitler, everyone except for me!
Everyone I don't like is literally Hitler, let's have a look and see:
- Donald Trump
- PewDiePie
- Pepe the Frog
- Hand signs
- Free speech
- Godwin's law

Example:
You Can't Get Your Change Back
" I don't like-a that sheeeet "

No Pussy Tonight.... " I don't like-a that sheeeet "

No Bottles No Drugs NO NOTHING...

" I don't like-a that sheeeet "

Example:
"My teacher was such a bitch today, she gave me a detention."
"Ew, I don't like that stuff."

"Hey, you wanna go get some ice cream?"
"I don't like that stuff."

Example:
here's an funny cool story
so i met this guy
in class
and he was like
"hey, ur kinda cute wanna go out?"
i laughed so hard
and said "no"
and everybody heard him
so he was mad all day
cuz ppl kept laughing
anyways i dont like this means nothing like:
girl1: this means nothing she was totes i don't like this on this post

Example:
You're a great guy, but I don't like you in that way.

*translation*

You're a great guy, and you have all the qualities in a guy I'm looking for, but I'm not going to be your girlfriend. I will, however, use you as a basis for comparison for all other guys who hit on me, but I'm going to be with someone who is far less nice, and who is probably an abusive alcoholic. Then, if he doesn't work out, I'll move on to another guy, but still not you. In fact, I will never be with you, but I will call you from time to time to complain about the guy that I am with.

Example:
Dave: Scotland Scotland Scotland
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Dave: ...
Splog: I don't like your FACE.

Immanuel Kant: Nature is the existence of things, so far as it is determined according to universal laws. Should nature signify the existence of things in themselves, we could never know it either a priori or a posteriori. Not a priori, for how can we know what belongs to things in themselves, since this never can be done by the dissection of our concepts (in analytical judgments)? We do not want to know what is contained in our concept of a thing (for the concept describes what belongs to its logical being), but what is in the actuality of the thing superadded to our concept, and by what the thing itself is determined in its existence outside the concept. Our understanding, and the conditions on which alone it can connect the determinations of things in their existence, do not prescribe any rule to things themselves; these do not conform to our understanding, but it must conform itself to them; they must therefore be first given us in order to gather these determinations from them, wherefore they would not be known a priori.
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Immanuel Kant: ...

Example:
And he can see no reasons
'Cause there are no reasons
What reason do you need to die, die, oh oh oh?
The silicon chip inside her head
Gets switched to overload
And nobody's gonna go to school today
She's gonna make them stay at home
And daddy doesn't understand it
He always said she was good as gold
And he can see no reasons
'Cause there are no reasons
What reason do you need to be shown?
I don't like Mondays
(Tell me why)
I don't like Mondays
(Tell me why)
I don't like
I don't like
(Tell me why)
I don't like Mondays
(Tell me why)
I don't like
I don't like
(Tell me why)
I don't like Mondays
(Tell me why)
I don't like Mondays
I wanna shoot the whole day down

Example:
When asked about his sexual preferences, Rufus replied "I don't like to label myself."