creation
by [email protected] on Dec 10, 2007 05:39:16
The act by which
God Almighty spoke the universe into existance out of nothing in the first chapter of Genesis in a matter of six time periods, but not necessarily six “days” as we are lead to believe. While mental midgets like “Adam “
tr0n”' at urbandictionary believe the universe cannot be created out of nothing, it indeed can! With God ALL things are possible, and the vast universe we live in was created out of nothing, is an example. When you are God Almighty, you can create something very complex out of nothing by just speaking it into existance. Period! Take that atheists and evolutionists. I’m sick and tired of mental half wits like “Adam ‘tr0n’” claiming that creation cannot be proven while evolution can.
Hogwash.
The missing link has NEVER been found and never will be. The “theory” of creation has NEVER changed, unlike evolution where its crazy followers are always changing their own theory. God’s universe has an order to it, and you cannot have an order if a
cataclysmic event like the “Big Big” occurred. If there is creation, there must be a creator. If there is a design, there must be a designer. If there is a plan, there must be a planner. This universe’s existance is proof positive of a
diety. Evolution is the the single-dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Darwin himself didn’t even believe his own theory, he just said it was an
educated guess and that’s it.
creationism
by Teflon Don on Apr 01, 2004 02:38:35
The idea that two centuries of consistent scientific data by thousands of logical minds is wrong and that Earth and life were not created by a causal chain of events but by an infinitely knowing, loving and powerful--yet seemingly indecisive and possibly bipolar--deity in less than a week. Its strongest argument is its
compelling assertion that if you don't believe in it, you'll go to Hell with everyone
Jerry Falwell finds personally distasteful and you'll all roast for eternity while demons
gangrape you with white-hot tridents.
creationism
by J on Oct 17, 2003 11:04:22
Example:
Did you see the movie creationism? It has the
wildest FX but, geez! Totally unrealistic story! A waste of money
if you ask me!
creationism
by SmashCrab on Mar 15, 2008 04:55:24
The modern equivalent of a
geocentric universe. Science proves irrefutably that causal, linear events led up to the ecosystem we see today. Since this idea just so happens to go against Christian doctrine, it is condemned by many Christians, who put forth a pseudoscience known as creationism, or intelligent design, in response.
Creationism is non-scientific, as there is no way to test it using empirical data. Many
creationists see perceived flaws in evolutionary theory as proof that creationism is true and provable. This is not true because
1.The so-called flaws are rooted in the misunderstanding or ignoring of the mechanics of evolution. Arguments such as "
irreducible complexity" illustrate that creationists do not understand the process of evolution. Evolution is yet to be discredited in the scientific community, where it is accepted universally.
2.Disproving one theory does not make another theory any more credible. Even though theory A may have been disproved, theory B still must make its case based on sound scientific data.
Creationists also believe that the world is in the order of 6,000 years old, which can easily be disproved with
radiometric dating. Creationists say that this technology is inaccurate, but have no proof of this whatsoever. Creationists also use the argument "Evolution is
just a theory." All that this argument does is show that they don't understand what a scientific theory is.
Debunking creationism (by virtue of exposing the fallacy of the "young Earth" theory) is very easy. Any high school student has the capability to do so. Scientists do not waste their time even addressing it at this point, as there has never been so much as a single piece of evidence in support of it. Those who claim to be creation scientists are not scientists at all, as they cannot apply the scientific method to their theories.
Example:
Jill: The theory of evolution is just that -- a theory. It's yet to be proven in any way.
James: Gravity is
just a theory, too. You should really read a book sometime. Besides the bible.
Hugh: God created the Earth 6,000 years ago with the entire ecosystem completely intact as we see it today.
Al: Um, dinosaur?
Hugh: Put there by the devil to deceive us.
Jenny: If evolution is true, how come we've stopped evolving?
Sally: Evolution takes place over long periods of time. You can't see it in your lifetime. We are still evolving.
Jenny: That's just stupid. You'll believe anything they tell you.
Will: Evolution is proven to be false by
the gaps in the
fossil record. In fact, the fossil record does more to disprove evolution than anything else. This proves creationism to be true.
Ben: Where did you hear that? We know that the ancestors of all
sea mammals are land mammals. We can see where homo sapien and neanderthal split off on two separate paths. You're just
parroting what some wacky
creationist said on TV, aren't you?
Will: At least I'll spend the rest of forever in eternal bliss. You're going to hell. What good will your evolution do you then?
Ben: :P
Billy: So, now that I have proven that your
crackpot evolution theory is wrong, you must accept my theory as true. My theory is that a giant potato-beast named pot-thak-to dreamed the universe one night 50 years ago and it came to be.
Alice: Good point. Which way to his temple?
creationism
by Ryan Griffin on Dec 01, 2005 12:10:13
One of three possible ideas
1.
Old Earth creationism - the belief that the origins of earth are divine in nature, yet do not
contradict with any scientific findings.
2. Young Earth creationism - the belief that the word of the Bible, or any similar holy book, is literal and that the world was created in about six thousand years. This belief basically says that any testable data showing that the world is older than six thousand years is wrong. Frequently deals with faith more than science, and when science is invoked, it is typically misused or misinterpreted.
3.
intelligent design
Example:
1. If one were to suppose that, to God, a day is more than twenty-four hours (which is possible because the sun was not created until the fourth day), then one could say that the Bible does not contradict scientific findings.
2. When a fake
plaster cast of a human footprint next to
a dinosaur's was used jokingly as a cover for a book by the late Stephen J.
Gould, a staunch pro-evolutionist, creationists lauded the use as proof that scientists believe in creationism, and that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, whereas in reality, almost no paleobiologists believe so.
creationism
by InjusticeForAll on Nov 13, 2005 14:24:17
The belief that the Christian God created the Earth and everything in it. There are two stories (chapters one and two of
Genesis in the Bible.) Recently, this has been a hot topic for debating whether if it should be taught in schools. Most
creationists merge the first half of chapter one, and the
second half of chapter two to create what they think should be taught in schools, but really, they should just pick one story and stick with it.
Example:
(
creationist) Evolution is the work of the devil.
Creationism should be taught in schools!
(non-ignorant person) Oh really? Which version?
(creationist) What do you mean which version? The one in the bilbe mother fucking Satanist cock sucking piece of shit.
(non-ignorant
perso) Chapters one and two are two TOTALLY different versions.
(creationist) Uhmm... Gay marriage is the devil!
(non-ignorant person) ...