editor's
(noun, plural)a
ragtag menagerie of losers, basement internet trolls, idiots, clowns, apes and dinosaurs entrusted by Urban Dictionary with the task of approving new words (a very ill-advised decision by Urban Dictionary in itself). Unsurprisingly, they botch jobs, often failed to abide by the guidelines, and some of them even became petty tyrants on a power trip, who reject every new word definitions, legitimate or not, to
sate their personal revenge on society for the fact that they are losers, basement trolls, apes and dinosaurs who have no life.
editors
by MrBashTheBashMan on Jan 16, 2013 22:30:44
a group of incompetent assholes who
review the submissions of definitions here on urban dictionary. is it really necesary to have over
350 definitions for the word penis? the majority of the definitions on this site either repeat exactly what another definition says or they don't even add a single intelligent thought to the word
being defined and is irrelevant. the fact that that i've written legitimate definitions to words that have not been defined yet further proves the editors' stupidity.
Example:
"i wrote a definition on urban dictionary to a word that hasn't been defined yet and the editors did not approve. i guess i'll just add a new definition for penis. 'the boy version of a vagina.' lol. this will never get
approved but i'll send it anyway."
a couple days later.
"
oh, well what do you know?
my definition for penis got approved. the editors must have down syndrome or something. good for them, then."
Editors
by Fuck Editors on Feb 01, 2006 08:41:22
Cocksucking assholes who choose to let words in that mean absolutley
jack shit but when given an actual definition used by society in a rural town they
piss on it.
editors
by skychasma on Sep 14, 2016 07:57:25
Something you can become with one
click of
a mouse.
Maybe having the ability for ANYONE to become an
editor wasn't a very good idea, huh?
Example:
There are very few editors who actually do their job right and
deny and
accept the right
definitions.
Editors
by Splek on Nov 03, 2008 10:32:49
There are
two kinds to Editors;
1. The good kind of Editor who pays attention and takes
alittle time out of their day to look and think about every new definition that comes along they're way. Usually doing 50~150 definitions in one sitting.
2. 10 year old
n00blets who think they actually have a chance at being the law somewhere, and usually say "NO" and "I Don't Know" to every definition. These usually get bored of this within two weeks.
Example:
1.
Guy1: I'm glad we have Editors! Sure it takes over a month for my deff to get through, but at least we have a filter!
Guy2: Are you on crack?
2.
n00blet:
lolololo i iz guna turn down all deez defs so
pplz wil haz to bow down 2 me nd i wil bee teh new kind uf ub!1!! lolollloll
Guy2:
BANHAMMER TIME!!!
I am an Editor, I assure you I am NOT a n00blet! I do about 100 within one sitting, and read and think about every definition I pass before I answer whether it should be posted or not! Don't think that Urban Dictionary is going down the drain! Its not there yet!
Editor
by The Official qwerty on Feb 19, 2018 11:07:15
Pieces of shit that reject completely accurate definitions but accept bullshit (example of a
real life editor produced as a
gif). If you ever have the choice to accept or deny a definition, you better accept it.
Example:
Nibba: What the fuck man this is bullshit.
Guy:
Editors denied your definition, huh.
Nibba: For the
13th time. I guess I'll just make another definition for penis.
editors
by Angry somoan on Aug 22, 2006 07:20:21
Editors
by Illfuckyourmotherfordays on Nov 03, 2013 21:44:29
The people at urban dictionary that accept the stupidest definitions that you can think of that don't make any sense. But, then they don't accept all of the GOOD definitions that actually have proper grammar and aren't 5 paragraphs of run on sentences something about grandmas with
ample breasts that make peanut bitter and jelly sandwiches on toasted
rye bread. They sometimes accept and reject definitions in a matter of minutes but, they mostly
take 2 months to reject a definition .
Example:
The
editors will probably
reject this definition because I am pointing out how they are fucking assholes that make about 15
thousand dollars a year.
editors
by Yea Fuck You Too on Jan 11, 2008 09:01:32
A bunch of fuck heads that decide whether or not words are published on UD. They take several weeks to "review" a word, and most likely just "chose to not
publish your word" without telling you why. Just like they "chose to not publish" this word.
urban dictionary: "
Define your world"...
lol ok.
This word will not get published, Yea I know.
editors
by Calico Kitsune on Nov 27, 2006 09:34:55
1) The
hard-working folks entrusted with reviewing all submissions to Urban Dictionary. They're not perfect, but bless their hearts, they do a darn good job at the end of the day. We should all thank the editors by buying them beer and sex.
2) The
dickholes who thought they were too good to
publish your definition. Hopefully their skin will fall off.