Jordan Peterson
The God of neutral pathology and an honorable nobleman of psychopathic inner cultivation that cures all mental ailments/inflictions of the mind (Especially PTSD. All hail the King.
Jordan Peterson's
A fuckin' white male Canadian psychologist that has harnessed meme magick with his Kermit voice. He utters things that have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.Jordan Peterson
Terrific but very unfunny Canadian intellectual famous for verbally beating the shit out of radical leftist ideologues. Good on him.
Jordan Peterson
Most people know this but it’s a name for when you have a gigantic explosive diarrhea level shite in your jorts.
Example:
John: Why are Michaels jorts brown all of a sudden?
Jimmy: Ah yes someone made him jump and he did a Jordan Peterson.
John: Ohhhh.
John: Why are Michaels jorts brown all of a sudden?
Jimmy: Ah yes someone made him jump and he did a Jordan Peterson.
John: Ohhhh.
Jordan Peterson
Canadian psychologist famous for his opposition to compelled speech, and for urging people to take accountability and action for their life rather than blaming others for their circumstances.
Example:
Blue haired teen: “is that Jordan Peterson? He is problematic because he doesn’t say things I like”
Everyone else: “you smell like funyuns, leave the lobsterlord alone”
Blue haired teen: “is that Jordan Peterson? He is problematic because he doesn’t say things I like”
Everyone else: “you smell like funyuns, leave the lobsterlord alone”
Jordan Peterson
A gamer rights advocate who got very famous for saying it's the libtards' fault if the gamers don't have girlfriends.
Example:
"After reading Jordan Peterson once, Bryan finally cleaned his room, climbed gold on League of Legends, and started to claim that western civilisation peaked with the Spartans."
"After reading Jordan Peterson once, Bryan finally cleaned his room, climbed gold on League of Legends, and started to claim that western civilisation peaked with the Spartans."
Jordan Peterson
A logical fallacy where one of the sides attempts to discredit the opposition by painting the other side as incapable of arguing on the topic, by pointing out a source about the topic (which is mostly too long to skim through in a short time) and stating that they must scan the said source extensively before they can talk about the said topic.
It is a combination of "red herring" and projected "self-incredulity" intended to act as a setback for the opposition or to cut off the exchange by saying "You don't understand this topic well enough to talk about it".
It is named after "Jordan Peterson" as he is often known for using this tactic.
It is a combination of "red herring" and projected "self-incredulity" intended to act as a setback for the opposition or to cut off the exchange by saying "You don't understand this topic well enough to talk about it".
It is named after "Jordan Peterson" as he is often known for using this tactic.
Example:
Example 1
-----------------------
Representative A: I wouldn't want to drop a Jordan Peterson here, but reading the work of (insert author/thinker) named (insert source/research name) is a must if we want to discuss this.
Example 2
-----------------------
Debator 1: It is not morally acceptable to suggest that the concept of human emotions can be put under an objective standard.
Debator 2: Well, in the work of "Sam Harris" named "The Moral Landscape", he talks about this topic extensively as to why this argument can be made. The suggested reasoning is not to divert our focus into utilitarianism, but to use it to identify what is beneficial for our well-being, which Sam Harris defines as the source of moral thinking.
Debator 1: I would have to disagree with that reasoning, and for that, I will be referring to (insert a counterpoint source or research). The reasoning of Q (author or thinker of the counterpoint) shows how your argument falls to pieces when faced with their deduction.
Debator 2: If you could elaborate on their reasoning, perhaps we can talk more about the topic and expand upon our debate through that.
Debator 1: I mean I could, but I don't think condensing a 600-page study into a few sentences can do it justice. And not to mention that we don't have the time tonight to go over all of the contents.
Debator 2: How are we supposed to continue our exchange then?
Debator 1: Read it, all of it, and come back. Then we can continue.
Example 1
-----------------------
Representative A: I wouldn't want to drop a Jordan Peterson here, but reading the work of (insert author/thinker) named (insert source/research name) is a must if we want to discuss this.
Example 2
-----------------------
Debator 1: It is not morally acceptable to suggest that the concept of human emotions can be put under an objective standard.
Debator 2: Well, in the work of "Sam Harris" named "The Moral Landscape", he talks about this topic extensively as to why this argument can be made. The suggested reasoning is not to divert our focus into utilitarianism, but to use it to identify what is beneficial for our well-being, which Sam Harris defines as the source of moral thinking.
Debator 1: I would have to disagree with that reasoning, and for that, I will be referring to (insert a counterpoint source or research). The reasoning of Q (author or thinker of the counterpoint) shows how your argument falls to pieces when faced with their deduction.
Debator 2: If you could elaborate on their reasoning, perhaps we can talk more about the topic and expand upon our debate through that.
Debator 1: I mean I could, but I don't think condensing a 600-page study into a few sentences can do it justice. And not to mention that we don't have the time tonight to go over all of the contents.
Debator 2: How are we supposed to continue our exchange then?
Debator 1: Read it, all of it, and come back. Then we can continue.
jordan peterson
silly boy him
Example:
jordan peterson bad
jordan peterson bad
Jordan Peterson's Vision
Ah! There it is! Found it! That's my unforgivable sin! I "corrupted his glorious vision"! His vision being he wanted to be a prophet. That's his vision. He wanted to be a prophet and I pointed out that when given the opportunity to actually help someone... He didn't. He dispassionately waved them off the stage. "I hope you get the help you need". That's what he said. And did the guy get it? Apparently not.
Example:
Hym "There it is! THEEEEEERE IT IS! I corrupted Jordan Peterson's vision. He wanted to be a prophet and considered one of the greatest thinkers of our generation but (unfortunately for him) he is neither of those things! And now he wants to take from me the things I want to be (or what he thinks I want to be) by denying reality and living a lie. And it's funny too because he IS kind of being heralded as a prophet BUT it's corrupted by the fact that he now has been made aware of the fact that he's full of shit. So, he's getting what he wants but it's a falsehood. I'm like the retard that fucked his co-workers! He's like ME! He's doing his little Jordan Peterson thing (like I was) and I'm fucking all his whore co-workers. I'm glad I treated the retard and the whores the way I did because apparently I was right to do that. Which means... RIGHT AGAIN! CAPTAIN ALWAYS RIGHT! THE RIGHTEST RIGHTY TO EVERY RIGHT! OR WRITE! THE RIGHTEST WRITER! THAT'S ME!" 😁👈
Hym "There it is! THEEEEEERE IT IS! I corrupted Jordan Peterson's vision. He wanted to be a prophet and considered one of the greatest thinkers of our generation but (unfortunately for him) he is neither of those things! And now he wants to take from me the things I want to be (or what he thinks I want to be) by denying reality and living a lie. And it's funny too because he IS kind of being heralded as a prophet BUT it's corrupted by the fact that he now has been made aware of the fact that he's full of shit. So, he's getting what he wants but it's a falsehood. I'm like the retard that fucked his co-workers! He's like ME! He's doing his little Jordan Peterson thing (like I was) and I'm fucking all his whore co-workers. I'm glad I treated the retard and the whores the way I did because apparently I was right to do that. Which means... RIGHT AGAIN! CAPTAIN ALWAYS RIGHT! THE RIGHTEST RIGHTY TO EVERY RIGHT! OR WRITE! THE RIGHTEST WRITER! THAT'S ME!" 😁👈
Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits
Ok so yeah he does seem to think that only the 3% of people have these personality traits... SO, I made a list!
Example:
Hym "Here is a list of Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits (with evidence!). Trait 1. Machiavellianism (Manipulation): Jordan likes to speak at a certain level of abstraction to obfuscate his beliefs (Regarding whether or not he believes in God or free will) and manipulate how he is conceptualized. Trait 2. Psychopathy (Parasitism): Has a parasitic relationship with his clients. Regularly using them for his own profit. Also parasitizes ME. Trait 3. Sadism Admits to having sadistic fantasies. Trait 4. Narcissism: Thinks he's "more competent" than everyone and thinks that anyone who even calls his integrity into question is jealous of him. Thinks he's above the rules and refuses to follow them. So... There you have it. Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits. He's either part of the 3% or he's wrong."
Hym "Here is a list of Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits (with evidence!). Trait 1. Machiavellianism (Manipulation): Jordan likes to speak at a certain level of abstraction to obfuscate his beliefs (Regarding whether or not he believes in God or free will) and manipulate how he is conceptualized. Trait 2. Psychopathy (Parasitism): Has a parasitic relationship with his clients. Regularly using them for his own profit. Also parasitizes ME. Trait 3. Sadism Admits to having sadistic fantasies. Trait 4. Narcissism: Thinks he's "more competent" than everyone and thinks that anyone who even calls his integrity into question is jealous of him. Thinks he's above the rules and refuses to follow them. So... There you have it. Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits. He's either part of the 3% or he's wrong."