Example:
Iam "I know but (
with all due respect) that doesn't effect my basic argument. So, let's call what I'm talking about a "Faux Status Indicator". How "Faux" the status is WOULD (however) be determined by the culture (for example, Ancient Greece or Rome) but..."
Hym "This "Faux Status Indicator" is the means by which some men
circumvent the status hierarchy."
Iam "... And I already broke down the logistics of it (so you can't say I'm changing it up on you), right? So I guess I can
frame it this way: What is the bare minimum amount of status required for a disproportionate amount of success?"
Hym "And what are the other means by which men can circumvent the status hierarchy? Is it FAME!? Is that why there is this hesitancy to acknowledge me? That's what I think. People don't want me to circumvent the hierarchy but they are absolutely willing to allow it or accept it across this singular immutable dimension. At least women are. Men don't have a choice in the matter. They are either the
beneficiary of circumstance or they are not. Some would actively try to PREVENT me from
circumventing their previous hierarchy. And those same people would
laud the fat cock for doing the exact same goddamn thing."
Iam "Not that I explicitly want
the fame..."
Hym "I WANT
THE FAME!"
Iam "... I've already said that fame is just assholes in your driveway at 4 a.m. trying to take a picture of you to sell. People already take pictures of me though... They aren't very subtle....."