Independent: Shit happens.
Democrat: Shit is a vast right-wing conspiracy.
Republican: The rich deserve more shit.
Moderate: We must also consider shit’s right to happen.
Liberal: Shit will happen if we don’t spend enough.
Conservative: The courts have allowed too much excrement.
Reform: We can’t get our poop in a group.
Socialist: Support the equal distribution of shit.
Communist: Come the revolution, shit will not happen again.
Libertarian: Legalize all kinds of shit.
Green: Compost happens.

A group of individuals who share a similar political philosophy. The two major parties in the United States are the Republican and Democratic parties. According to UrbanDictionary, both parties are failures and a waste of power, time, and money. In reality, neither party likes each other, especially in policy making. Political party preference is the main reason this country is "divided," since each party takes a particular stance on certain issues such as abortion and gay rights.

A cult with too much power.

Lack of free-thought or free thinking; each and every political party in existence is too biased, countering out any form of mediocrity. To compromise is essential, because all parties have some of form of merit, regardless of how little or large.

When one view becomes too extreme on an issue, it turns everything into a black & white reference. Bullshit: nothing is completely black & white. In life, there is always a complex mixture hidden within to take that aspect out of focus and bring its meaning to completely different level.

If there is a right political party, it's taking into consideration every element of a certain stance, eliminating whichever viewpoint you dislike, and keeping the association of the group it pertains to completely away.

Yet, we vote based upon a political party and having to "choose" which size is the best fit, even though the size is one too large or too small.

a political group that holds certain views or beliefs, and tries to attain or maintain there party in power of the U.S. Government.

Democrat Views- (Liberal or Social Liberalism), Pro-Choice(choice of abortion), Pro-Gay Marriage(Gay Marriage Being Legal),Pro-Universal Health Care, Separation of Church and State, Strong Civil Liberties, Social Progressivism, Cultural Pluralism, Government ensuring of Positive Rights (Government providing education, health car ect.), Anti-Socialism, Mixed Economy, Stricter Gun Control, More Government Intervention, Limited Government Economy, Anti-Corporate Welfare, Diplomacy over Military Action, Stem Cell Research,Environmental Protection, Pro-Welfare

Republican Views- More economic freedom, Connection of Church and State, Social Conservatism, Anti-Universal Health Care, Anti-Gay Marriage, Anti-Abortion, Raising Tax's to balance Budget, Tax-Cuts, Pro-Tortue on Suspected Terrorists, Anti-Affirmitave Action, Pro-military spending, Anti-Welfare

Liberal Criticisms- Gay Marriage is against God, Abortions kill the unborn, Stem Cell research supports abortion, The constitution says that people are allowed to Bare-Arms, Unpatriotic, Dont pay attention to Illegal immigration, They want to change health care regulation

Conservative criticism- Think religion should be mixed in with government, Don't pay attention to the environment, Care more about the unborn the the already living, Care about the unborn so much, they would go against stem-cell research, which could substantially help the already living, Give criminals easy access to fire arms, give tax refunds that help the wealthy but not the middle or lower class, Support government getting in to citizens private lives, teach Abstinence-only sex education which is unrealistic, Supports foreign aggression more than they should

A group of skilled liars (see politician) who will stop at nothing to push an agenda, to the dismay of the people they're supposed to "represent".

It's the way they force shit into your mouth and get paid to make you, your family, and your community's lives worse.

Advocates for a government where policy is managed via a respiratory hosting service that governs voluntarily via subscription plans. The GitHub Political Party would put in place a open-source government that stores revisions of projects for ideologies and policies.

In practice the Github party would advocate for a voluntary society in which groups and individuals maintain and develop their culture or interests whilst maintaining a pluralist attitude valuing philoxenia (a love of strangers). Their philoxenia & their pluralist attitude are valued by each of the societies, despite them being apart of various schools of thought because they all consider the possibility that the other society is more correct. Each of these societies evinces a willingness to update their theories as more evidence becomes available. These voluntary societies treat their ideas like code where there are willing to update to new versions, fork into separate versions experimenting with different ideas, and are willing to boot up older iterations with the knowledge they obtained with newer iterations.
Within these voluntary societies people will be able to vote with their feet or dollar ;in lieu of, diluted votes often associated with regular democracy.

When people (most famously pundits like Hannity, O'Reilly, Olbermann, ect.) blame all of our problems and nitpick the problems of their opposing party. While not touching on subjects that portray THEIR party negatively.

Or more simply, somebody of one party blames all of their countries problems on their opposing party. While ignoring anything negative their party has done to the country.

A political party that "pops-up" one day claiming to be revolutionary. When it comes to actual elections, the party often fails miserably and disbands quickly after. The Brexit Party, Change UK, Alba Party and ATWA are all examples.