Caveat. See it? Right there. That's what he does. "Sensible" 👈 That is what a
caveat looks like.
Hym "Look at the qualitative adjective usage of the word 'sensible' to create a
quasi-(if not true)
No True Scotsman fallacy. That's you trying to fit everything into your little 'Competence' box. 'Competence' is YOUR highest value and you are just projecting that onto women. I am good and good people value competence above all else. Women are good (unilaterally somehow 🤔) and, therefore, must also value competence above all else.
Example:
Jeffrey
Bezo, Elon Musk, Bill Gates they're objective
competence doesn't prevent their relationships from failing and the women who care about ability to generate resources aren't around long enough for them to need to accrue more resources than they already have. Nor were they able to gauge their competence BEFORE they had become wealthy NOR are they the highest
calibur of women that a man could hope to aquire. Accept for Amber Heard. Who also happens to be crazy and abusive and fucks literally everything that walks. This applies to
Hollywood actors, ect... Their ability to continue to make money isn't why Pete Davidson is attractive to Ariana Grande. You lay all responsibly for the world's ills at the feet of men to protect women from... Also men. You've gone so far past 'White knighting' it is surreal. It's wild to me that the
Red pill community lauds you as a saint when, in reality, you're just taking 'White knighting' to it's logical extreme. You're 'White Savioring.' (Not to be confused with 'White savior complex' which is a white person who stands up for the rights of black people).... You know what? We have to call it something else.... Hmm... Let's call it 'White
kinging.' Hmmm... I don't like that either 'White Generaling?' Yeah, that's better because in Fire Emblem the Knight turn into Generals as they level up into their next class. 'White Generaling.' 'Sensible' Women? Pfft!